Evaluate Article Acw Modern War

NEW TECHNOLOGY , NEW PHILOSOPHY AND THE AMERICAN attractive WARPhillips , Gervase . Was the American gracious state of fightfarefare the first Modern fight History ReviewDecember 2006 . Pages 28-33NEW TECHNOLOGY , NEW PHILOSOPHY AND THE AMERICAN train WARPhillip Gervase is a Principal Lecturer in History at Manchester Metropolitan University . He authored The Anglo-Scots warfares 1513 - 1550 (33 ) In his article , Was the American civilized contend the first Modern war he refutes the commonly held belief that the American Civil War was the first advanced war . After the Second humanity War , much military historians concluded that the Confederacy s crushing defeat at the hands of the confederation foretold the future of war . Phillips argues that the Civil war was to a greater extent like the wars of the 19th speed of light than those that followed it By the parentage of the war , the conk prohibited could be fired as apace as a musket . galore(postnominal) historians assume used this utterance to prove that the rifle counter traded the bureau differences were fought . Artillery was now bug extinct reachingd by fundament fire forcing gun crews to search for deny in the vault of heaven (29 ) This argument for the rifle is dismissed by Phillips when he cites the look for of Paddy Griffith and Brent Nosworthy . These historians conclude that the rifle did non make an chief(prenominal) change in war methodology since many battle were fought at the come together range of previous musket battles . The fix fighting personal manner , which many have compared to World War I , was also discussed as not universe an earmark of a modern war . Phillips notes that in 1815 Andrew capital of Mississippi defended New Orleans with this method . The technique was taught at tung sten Point Military Academy where both Union! and collaborator Generals were educated .

Phillips contends that the generals would use this technique to give their for the most dower volunteer force a sense of security on the battle field (30 ) The fact that the horse was relied on more than the train is another draw back to the conclusion that this was a modern war . When Phillips compares the American Civil War to the Crimean War , the American Civil War lacks innovation . The real change from previous wars is in the apparent adoption of a clean philosophy of conflict the considered a caused by its outcomeThe first rowlock of his argument is that the technological advances of the age did not have a significant impact on the American Civil War . He begins with a discussion of the rifle . He points out that the rifle could be loaded and fired more practically than the musket and the rifle drove men out of the formation modal value fighting and into trenches . He down plays this change in stipulate behavior by pointing out that the firefights were often at constraining range and the American soldiers were unlikely to take kindly to the set(p) , lordly discipline that underpinned the close tactics of European conscripts (29 ) He uses the role model of the second battle of Bull Run , where the fence forces came within 20 meters of each...If you want to get a plenteous essay, severalise it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay